Thursday, June 29, 2006

What I Call Journalism

I'm eager to introduce a terrific venture that my dear friend Sarah Stuteville is involved in, by the name of the Common Language Project. This involves aggressive, risk-taking journalism in places most of us tend to shudder at; Cambodia, India, Pakistan, to name a few. The project goal as I get it (caveat: my impression here, not the words of those doing the heavy lifting) is publicizing constructive projects and activities in remote places where our increasingly irrelevant mainstream corporate media don't/won't go and where the gazillions of US corporate dollars sucked out of the middle/lower classes are conspicuously absent, presumably because the profit margin sucks.

To be clear, this program bears no resemblance to the Highlight Magazine happy junk you may have been infected with in the doctor's office way back when. No trumped-up good news crappola. It is Good News in the sense of actual people helping people. Real folks caring for and taking care of each other. Remember when we had that here? These Real Reporter folks are scrabbling to uncover these uplifting scenarios in places far away.

I offer this partly as reinforcement for the progressive principles so critical as we work to become a part of US governance again - we need government because the profit-principle does not compel any corporation to look out for any entity but itself - and, yes, their stockholders. Government absolutely has to be there to regulate that greed. The bottom line, as we all should know, probably with personal experience to back it up, is that true community spirit and support of the common resources are absolutely anathema to the folks desperately using unprecedented levels of secrecy and media-bashing in hopes of hiding their criminality.

As a terrific recent read (Amusing Ourselves to Death) suggests, this edgy work by the Common Language Project folks is not shallow or insipid enough - not to mention not being constantly amusing in the sense of pratfalls and the like - to make it into our mainstream media. These folks are enduring genuine discomfort and risk in the interest of reporting "news." I gather there was formerly some of this available in the era before constant barrages of television, including tv-supervision of preschoolers, turned many of us into folks with an attention span measured in seconds. Real "news" is not something mainstream television offers these days. And of course tv-crippling often leads to no appetite for anything resembling exposition or rational analysis. That impatience and limitation in cerebral skills might explain a good part of the rancid political spectrum these days - name-calling, strawmen, swift-boating, and sleazy political rovian stunts are just the assumed parlance.

I've known Sarah's dad for a good long time, stretching back to high school in the late '60's. He's as close to a soul-brother as I have. We do not get nearly enough time together, but have managed to hang in there via a couple weekends in the mountains and a few social events each year. We've shared high-fives on all but one of the big volcanoes in Washington State so far and interesting experiences on a lot of other peaks in between.

Sarah is a source of wonderment and admiration, with an imagination and courage that are astounding. I cannot do full justice to the venture taken on by Sarah and her co-heroes Jessica and Alex in my own words. I will excerpt a bit here, but suggest you check out their website and strongly encourage a monetary contribution - this is a pretty shoe-string operation from what I can tell, considering the scoops they have been offering up. A donation would be greatly appreciated and might make the difference in their ability to report a story that would otherwise never reach the light of day.

Excerpts from the CLP website:

Siem Reap, CAMBODIA-The landscape is all dust and smoke and heat. In the parched countryside the fields smolder and burn under a brutal sun. March is the height of Cambodia’s dry season and all over the country peasants are clearing and preparing the land for planting rice when the rains come. But here in Chrun, a remote village near the Thai border and a holdout of the Khmer Rouge as late as 1998, the burning land serves another dangerous purpose. These farmers hope the flames will detonate the hundreds of thousands of landmines and unexploded ordnance (UXO) that litter their land--before one of them or their children does.

“This is a dangerous season,” says Aki Ra, a man who has devoted the last fifteen years of his life to de-mining Cambodia, “the farmers are working the land and moving further a field, this is when they are discovering more mines and explosives. They hope that burning the field will also blow up anything, but they don’t know how to do it and it is dangerous for them.”

If anyone knows about the dangers of landmines, it’s Aki Ra. Born in Siem Reap province around 1973, he grew up on war and violence. By the age of five both of his parents had been executed by the Khmer Rouge, and at ten he was given an AK-47 and became one of the many child soldiers that made up their army.

The Vietnamese Army that liberated Cambodia from the Khmer Rouge reached the northwestern regions much later than the rest of the country, and even then the fighting wasn’t over for Aki Ra, who says that for most of his life he only understood the world as being perpetually at war. As a teenage conscript of the Vietnamese he would do much of the landmine laying in areas he would later commit his life to de-mining. See below for a timeline of the war in Cambodia.

[clip]

Phnom Penh, CAMBODIA – At first glance, Tumlop 2 village looks like any third world city slum: crowded huts with corrugated tin roofs are scattered along dusty dirt paths, and barefoot children mingle with freely wandering chickens and dogs. Look closer and you’ll find that this community also houses a tidy health center where local women diagnose and treat common ailments. Look even closer and you’ll see that gender relations in this poor and traditional society may be more evolved than in the more wealthy households of the teeming and ever-expanding city that surrounds them.

Inside the health center, a humble but cleanly scrubbed building rising on thin stilts above the scummy green water that surrounds it, large plastic jars of medicinal herbs stand near a modest medicine cabinet, though many prescribed herbal remedies will be made on the spot, using fresh plants growing nearby. Posters promoting literacy and gender equality cover the simple plank walls – this small center is also home to trainings on domestic violence and women’s rights.

Urban Poor Women Development (UPWD), a nonprofit organization located in Phnom Penh, helped the Tumlop 2 community develop its health center in 1998, and the organization’s six paid staff and five volunteers are currently helping 11 slum communities in the area, with plans to add three more this year.

The organization first developed its health program when the international anti-poverty group Actionaid sent a volunteer medical expert from its India program to train UPWD staff in community health care.

[clip]

Uttar Pradesh, INDIA--The whirr of old fashioned sewing machines reverberates in the high-ceilinged room. Forty girls dressed in uniform green and yellow salwar kameez bend their heads towards their stitching as shafts of afternoon sunlight warm their identical hairstyles of black looped braids.

In India this scene easily evokes the word sweatshop, and rightly so. Twenty five percent of India’s population lives below the poverty line (defined for rural areas at $8 a month--or enough to buy exactly 2200 calories per day), and impoverished girls and young women are an easily exploited demographic. But here in Anoopshahr Sub-district in the northern state of Uttar Pradesh (UP), these students at Pardada Pardadi Girl’s Vocational School are not sewing for someone else’s profit, but for their own futures.

While India is currently the second fastest growing economy in the world, it is also home to the world’s largest population of poor people, half of whom are concentrated in three rural states, including UP. In a country where two thirds of the population works in agriculture, mostly as subsistence farmers, stories of technology millionaires seem light years away, and the hope that the recent success of an emerging urban middle class will trickle down is too distant a promise for most rural Indians.

“Everyone in the world is talking about how India is shining,” says Sam Singh, a local man who made his fortune in the United States, and returned five years ago to found the school, “and it’s true, but only for about twenty percent. You have to ask how these twenty percent can fly with the other eighty percent hanging off of them.”

[clip]

Monday, June 26, 2006

Forget the Incompetence

It seems obvious once you see the words in print; I not uncommonly wince when I hear someone railing about presidential incompetence and stupidity. Lord, I fess I have given in to the temptation at times myself - it's almost irresistible I guess at certain transition points in one's emotional phase diagram. It's extremely frustrating for many of us that this fake folksy schmuck has been able to gain such wealth and power with no evidence that he has any actual interest in anyone but himself, a dime's worth of personal capability, or a nickel's worth of accountability. He's obviously a total dufuss on every level - but a dufuss who is evil enough to cause thousands of deaths rather than give up his evil ways. (I'm off in the corner now, counting to calmness.)

But as with other strongly-worded arguments I have read lately (the imperative to not ignore the rantings of the Coulter-spawn comes to mind), this post by George Lakoff, Marc Ettlinger, and Sam Ferguson seems pretty persuasive that there is a danger in becoming attached to - or even smug over - the incompetence meme.

Progressives have fallen into a trap. Emboldened by President Bush’s plummeting approval ratings, progressives increasingly point to Bush's "failures" and label him and his administration as incompetent. For example, Nancy Pelosi said “The situation in Iraq and the reckless economic policies in the United States speak to one issue for me, and that is the competence of our leader."

Self-satisfying as this criticism may be, it misses the bigger point. Bush’s disasters — Katrina, the Iraq War, the budget deficit — are not so much a testament to his incompetence or a failure of execution. Rather, they are the natural, even inevitable result of his conservative governing philosophy. It is conservatism itself, carried out according to plan, that is at fault. Bush will not be running again, but other conservatives will. His governing philosophy is theirs as well. We should be putting the onus where it belongs, on all conservative office holders and candidates who would lead us off the same cliff. To Bush’s base, his bumbling folksiness is part of his charm — it fosters conservative populism. Bush plays up this image by proudly stating his lack of interest in reading and current events, his fondness for naps and vacations and his self-deprecating jokes. This image causes the oppositionto underestimate his capacities — disregarding him as a complete idiot — and deflects criticism of his conservative allies. If incompetence is the problem, it’s all about Bush. But, if conservatism is the problem, it is about a set of ideas, a movement and its many adherents. The idea that Bush is incompetent is a curious one. Consider the following (incomplete) list of major initiatives the Bush administration, with a loyal conservative Congress, has accomplished:

• Centralizing power within the executive branch to an unprecedenteddegree
• Starting two major wars, one started with questionable intelligenceand in a manner with which the military disagreed
• Placing on the Supreme Court two far-right justices, and stacking thelower federal courts with many more
• Cutting taxes during wartime, an unprecedented event
• Passing a number of controversial bills such as the PATRIOT Act, theNo Child Left Behind Act, the Medicare Drug bill, the Bankruptcy bill and anumber of massive tax cuts
• Rolling back and refusing to enforce a host of basic regulatoryprotections
• Appointing industry officials to oversee regulatory agencies
• Establishing a greater role for religion through faith-basedinitiatives
• Passing Orwellian-titled legislation assaulting the environment —“The Healthy Forests Act” and the “Clear Skies Initiative” — to deforestpublic lands, and put more pollution in our skies
• Winning re-election and solidifying his party’s grip on Congress

These aren’t signs of incompetence. As should be painfully clear, the Bush administration has been overwhelmingly competent in advancing its conservative vision. It has been all too effective in achieving its goals by determinedly pursuing a conservative philosophy. It’s not Bush the man who has been so harmful, it’s the conservative agenda.

[clip]