Saturday, December 22, 2007

Well Then Can I Walk Beside You?

For devoted readers, this is another in my (short) series of somewhat tortured “connections” posts. Unexpected linkages and “coincidences” fascinate me. Evocation of classic Stones tune and Burke PBS series and book are just fine too.

I came upon a review a while back of a small book entitled “Music from Big Pink.” I could not help but be intrigued at a book sharing title with seminal Band album I love. It turns out this is but one of a series of books (“33 and 1/3”) I gather commissioned by the publisher, Continuum Press, on similarly-classic vinyl platters. From what I can tell, the series has been quite a success. If you are invested in contemporary music and still on civilized terms with bound volumes, consider checking these books out. I haven’t really properly assessed the full stable, but I believe there are books on Dusty Springfield’s “Dusty in Memphis” and other classics such as Electric Ladyland, Pet Sounds, Exile on Main Street, Born in the USA, Harvest, Aja, Achtung Baby, and Highway 61. How could you not be intrigued with at least a few of those?

As it happens, my entrée to the series is a little unusual. No musical criticism here. This is full-on fiction, crafted around the Big Pink/Woodstock zeitgeist. “Pink” was a bit dark, being told from the POV of a drug dealer-to-the-stars whose life might charitably be called bleak. Most of the book is set in the Woodstock area circa 1968-9, when the album Big Pink and, as I recall, the Basement Tapes were fermenting. Entertaining, well-written, and pretty dark would be my précis on the book.

I gather companion volumes tend more towards non-fictional commentaries and such. I am definitely interested in further exploration in this book family.

But what about those connections I keep going on about, you ask? I acquired this book via library reserve I placed a while back. Not an interminably long wait, in comparison with some of my library holds, but enough to be unpredictable. While I was reading it, another of my holds, “Taking Woodstock,” came in. This is a memoir by the chap who apparently connected the festival promoters, thwarted elsewhere in upstate New York, with Max Yasgur, the author’s neighbor and friend.

This is a great and highly entertaining memoir, likewise recommended, with entertaining Bildungsroman subtexts including growing up gay in NYC, wildly dysfunctional parents, and the dramatic effect Woodstock had on all three of them.

The time-and-place linkage is a little fuzzy, I admit, but fascinating to a West Coast native matriculating in Jersey at the time, hyped on rock music and Dylan in particular, but as it happened back West when the deal went down. And of course it was tough to find a real-time vantage point for assessing the whole Woodstock thing without dramatic distortion while it was happening – or probably ever since. I’m not clear on the precise propinquity between the Big Pink sessions and Woodstock, but even rough conjunction is pretty fascinating. So there’s one fun book-to-book semi-connection.

Backing away from that for a moment, we were enjoying Sarah McLachlan’s excellent “Wintersong” holiday disk the other day. It was a revelation to me to hear someone else do Joni’s “River,” a great tune. So I was excited when the original came up in my iPod’s shuffle mode the next day. If Mr. Gaye had not come on quickly I would have turned the pod off to leave good ring in ears. As it happened, assertive co-worker accosted me about earphones: listening to “Christmas Carols”? I admitted that prior to Marvin I had indeed enjoyed a Mitchell near-carol. She was excited to offer up the Vanity Fair she’d been reading, which had great photo of Mitchell. Connection! I came away with mag, and enjoyed Mitchell and others, including Guthrie family, Baez, Taylor family, and Richie Havens. Squib noted that Havens led off Woodstock, and that his “Freedom,” performed as an encore, was more or less improvised, quite astonishing.

A couple days later I was savoring new book Taking Woodstock, only to learn that Havens was conscripted to lead off the festival as he was in effect the only musician available. TW does not mention the improvised aspect of Freedom, but does call out the song by name (supposedly heard at the author’s motel a good long way from the site). Connection.

Somehow I dropped into a Catskills eddy and have been thrown back a few decades. Not unpleasant, mind you. For that matter, I just witnessed 12:34.56 on watch. Past my bedtime! Will finish and post later.

Back again, earlier than night-owl signoff the other night, but not by as much as I would have liked.

As I wrap this up, just for the record you do recall who wrote the song “Woodstock,” don’t you?

Bingo. Excellent! Connection! See - you can play at this too.

We are stardust, we are golden,
We are billion year old carbon,
And we got to get ourselves back to the garden.

Monday, December 17, 2007

Dodd is a Winner

Must be brief. Sleep is nigh and etc.

You were edgy all day, weren't you, about how this Senate bill business regarding FISA and possible immunity for the mega-telecommunications corporations from prosecution for violating the law would work out, right? I'm sleepless here, having hung in to help you with late-night update.

Edgy would barely describe my state. Frankly, no F'ing way those gazillion-dollar-per-year profiteers should have anything in the way of immunity from the law. I can't remember how many polls and letters I have signed recently on this. The default has sadly become that the bigs rip off the smalls. Now that the practice seems to be that corporations - especially big ones - have a lot more rights and political sucking-up from the likes of Dick and George than actual people do - we must assure that these lawbreakers are brought back within the venue of the rule of law. No amnesty.

Hopefully I can pull off assembly of a few excerpts and links here that will be of use should you have been thwarted for whatever reason in tracking the day's events.

The inimitable Christy at FireDogLake has this

Sen. Chris Dodd gave a barnburner of a speech this morning, laying out the reasons that the rule of law ought to trump the CYA demands of the Bush Administration and complicit telecoms who trailed along in their unlawful wake -- before and after 9/11, for years. I'm reprinting the speech in its entirety -- as it was prepared for delivery -- because I felt that folks who weren't able to follow along would appreciate the read.

In the face of a challenge to the rule of law and the foundations of government, true patriots stand up. Thank you to Sen. Dodd for doing so today.

Mr. President:


I rise to urge my colleagues to vote against cloture on S. 2248, the FISA Amendments Act of 2007.

Opposing cloture is essential, because there is no unanimous consent agreement in place providing for the immediate adoption of the Judiciary Committee substitute amendment.

As you know, Mr. President, the Judiciary substitute amendment, among other things, strikes Title II of the Intelligence Committee bill—the title which seeks to provide retroactive immunity to telecommunications companies who are alleged to have violated their customers' privacy rights by turning over information to the government without warrants.

I am fully aware that the Majority Leader has various parliamentary options at his disposal to move this legislation forward. It is his right to attempt to invoke cloture.

But I regret that decision, and I hope that my colleagues will join me in stopping this legislation.
Mr. President, why do I feel so strongly about this matter?


For the last six years, our largest telecommunications companies have been spying on their own American customers.

Secretly and without a warrant, they delivered to the federal government the private, domestic communications records of millions of Americans—records this administration has compiled into a database of enormous scale and scope.

That decision betrayed millions of customers' trust. It was unwarranted—literally.

But was it illegal?

That, Mr. President, I don't know. And if this bill passes in its current form, we will never know. The president's favored corporations will be immune.

Their arguments will never be heard in a court of law. The details of their actions will stay hidden. The truth behind this unprecedented domestic spying will never see light. And the book on our government's actions will be closed, and sealed, and locked, and handed over to the safe-keeping of those few whom George Bush trusts to keep a secret.

-clip-

And then there is this:

Harry Reid just pulled the telecom bill. The Senate will take it up again after the first of the year, but for now there will be no retroactive telecom immunity.

Karen Tumulty wrote over at Swampland earlier in the day:

from the Department of Freudian Typos:

Dodd's campaign at 5:59 p.m. sent out an e-mail update with this subject line:

DODD CONTINUES TO APPLY LEADERSHIP TO SENATE LEADERSHIP

At 6:05 p.m., it sent out a corrected e-mail with this subject line:

DODD CONTINUES TO APPLY PRESSURE TO SENATE LEADERSHIP

I guess he did.

Chris Dodd showed tremendous leadership. He stood by his principles and wouldn't back down, even in the face of opposition from members of his own party who were in the tank for the telecos and the Bush Administration.

Well played, Senator Dodd.

-clip-

Sunday, December 16, 2007

Their Cheatin' Heart

This is in the way of a reminder/wakeup call, on the off-chance one is needed, of the sort of sleazy tricks and shenanigans we can expect to be subjected to by the truckload, day-in and day-out, in the coming year. The Republican Party can be counted on to use every means at their disposal, legal, ethical, or not, with efficacy a far more important criterion than any conscience-based metric to try to prevent the avalanche in opposition to their now apparent corruption that seems almost inevitable.

Which is to say, almost as those elephants might in a different context, that this could in some senses be seen as a contest between Good and Evil. I would not cast it quite that way, but one could. We are (or should be) of a mind to tolerate differences of opinion, cultivate partnerships even with those we disagree with on some issues, and strongly defend the idea of the Commons. We must also strongly defend the critical role of government in containing the inevitable rapaciousness of corporations and just plain greedy bastards who unfortunately often end up as CEOs and politician-cronies, and insist on governance that is for the people and smart enough to be effective.

Those principles seem to me totally at odds with the present administration's criminal program and the Republican Party's obvious long-term goals of hegemony and a move to a highly authoritarian anti-democracy form of government wholly at odds with our founding principles. To reiterate, I believe we can expect to experience numerous events in the next twelve months that could, sadly, echo "false flag" events by, for example, the Nazis (Reichstag Fire, among others) and our own USA (many examples, USS Maine in Spanish-American War, Tonkin Gulf in Viet Nam context merely illustrative).

I want to believe that those of us wary/olfactory enough to have smelled the stink a long time ago are finally being joined by others angered at having been suckered. Their "party" has for some time succeeded at playing fast-and-loose with incompatible promises and conspicuously engaged in "might makes right" and "ends justify means," to the disservice of "do unto others as you would have them do unto you." There is reason for hope that the jilted might not simply settle back into their barca-lounger.

One recent bit of skunkery, a “flag” in its’ own way:

Florida4Marriage sounds like the worst boy band of all time, but it turns out it's not. It's a Republican front group, run by a personal injury lawyer, to lure gay-hating boobs into the voting booths next November.

Florida4Marriage, and its chairman, John Stemberger (a recognized leader in rental car accident law) are the people behind Florida's new Marriage Protection Amendment, and yesterday they finally got the signatures they need to put it on the 2008 ballot.

So come on down! And while you're in there, marking the magic X that proves you're not a homo -- and that your life wasn't a squalid waste of everyone's time, because at least you got yerself hitched -- why not also vote for a Republican president?

Something for you. Something for the GOP. It's a get-out-the-vote win/win.

Anti-gay amendments are the Happy Meal toy of Republican politics.

-clip-